Carbon dating false Melayudating
But even he “realized that there probably would be variation”, says Christopher Bronk Ramsey, a geochronologist at the University of Oxford, UK, who led the latest work, published today in Science.
By measuring the ratio of the radio isotope to non-radioactive carbon, the amount of carbon-14 decay can be worked out, thereby giving an age for the specimen in question.
If one believes the story of Noah and applies that assumption to current scientific models, they do not conflict. In many ways, Carbon Dating is another example of science demonstrating the literal truths found in the Bible.
* * * For further research from a different angle, here’s an interesting video compiled from research done in the 70s and 80s that points to other effects of the flood.
Since the 1960s, scientists have started accounting for the variations by calibrating the clock against the known ages of tree rings.
As a rule, carbon dates are younger than calendar dates: a bone carbon-dated to 10,000 years is around 11,000 years old, and 20,000 carbon years roughly equates to 24,000 calendar years.
Search for carbon dating false:
One particularly interesting theory shows that the majority of the world has a single large land mass.